artilecastles.com artilecastles.com
   Main :> About Us :> Privacy of Info :> Terms & Conditions :> Add Your Link :> Add Your Article
Search:   
Add Your Link
 

Creative Arts

Shopping & Auction

Games & Play

Family & Home

Self Help

Business & Companies

Hotels & Travel

Eating & Drinking

Teens & Kids

Finance & Investment

Sports

News & Media

Medicine & Treatment

Jobs & Careers

Academics & Learning

Entertainment

Fitness & Health

Automotive

Property & Estate

Society & Issues

Fashion & Lifestyle

Computers & Software

Law & Politics

Science & Space


 

Main –› Academics & Learning –› Pure Sciences
 

Unintended Conclusions from Differences in Definitional Premises

 

Many believe that scientists, academia and researchers are smarter than everyone else. They believe that since they know or believe that they know certain laws of physics that they are the only ones who can make new discoveries. They believe that all concepts worthy of thought or expenditures on innovative experiment will come from their field.

Often they will say that: If you start with the wrong premise, you will end up at the wrong conclusion. Their premise of course being a theory or scientific definition being used in the strictest of terms which follows their particular area of science. This is the exact reason that most of the best innovations of mankind start or come from outside their own realm of science and/or from a renegade of sorts.

The fact is that just because one starts with the wrong premise or strict definition, does not mean that the individual will come up with the wrong answer. The answer maybe wrong or the question maybe miss asked, but the conclusion maybe relevant in some way. Even if the answer is wrong it may lead one to a new question, which refutes the laws of physics by its answer or blows holes in the strict definition being used.

In fact if you start from an incorrect premise you will arrive at the incorrect answer only if the theories are correct and the definitions are relevant to the new discovery. It is safe to say therefore that one who starts with an incorrect premise based on definitions that they will reach an unintended conclusion. But that certainly does not mean it is not a valuable conclusion. After all we may have just learned the 999 th way not to build a light bulb.

Now then in conclusion of my comment I wish to alert the scientific community of their error. I will explain abstractly why you are holding the human race back and slowing the forward progression of the species. Because you are making yourselves look bad while wasting your own cranial capacity, billions of dollars per year in research grants and everyones time in the process.

You see if you start in a box close the lid by encasing yourself in definitions, you are so confined you may not ever get out of your tunnel to see what was really flickering on the wall. I hope you see my point. If not you have dishonored the human race and perhaps our quest for space. Think on it.

Author: Lance Winslow
 
Author Bio:

Lance Winslow

Currently Lance is retired at age 40 and is running an Online Think Tank Forum while traveling North America. Perhaps considering something extremely challenging to do that will exercise his mind and utilize all his experiences, observations and skills. Any ideas?

This article can be searched using: social sciences, health colorado at denver & health sciences, 10 social sciences
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Randomizing Class Choices: Breaking Up the Monotony
 
GED Study Tip: For Real Knowledge, Reinforce the Learning Process
 
Beating the High Price of Gasoline with Biodiesel
 
From LPN to RN in the Comfort of Your Home
 
An Introduction to Biodiesel
 
Education - How Important Is College?
 
College - Beating Homesickness
 
Quality Control Online
 
N400 Brain Wave to Assist in Learning and in Performance
 
How to Use Household Objects to See What's Underwater
 
 
 
Main :> Privacy of Info :> Terms & Conditions  
Copyright © 2006-2008 www.articlecastles.com - All Rights Reserved.